Donate
Advocacy Letter

Letter in Support of Washington D.C.’s Revised Criminal Code Act of 2022

Many of the bill’s provisions will bring D.C.’s criminal penalties closer in line with criminological evidence on public safety, improve fairness and proportionality and advance racial justice in the criminal legal system.

Council of the District of Columbia
John Wilson Building
1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20004

Dear Councilmembers:

The Sentencing Project, a national criminal justice research and advocacy organization headquartered in Washington, DC, supports the passage of the Revised Criminal Code Act of 2022 (RCCA), B24-0416. Many of the bill’s provisions will bring D.C.’s criminal penalties closer in line with criminological evidence on public safety, improve fairness and proportionality and advance racial justice in the criminal legal system.

Several of the RCCA’s features will help to scale back extreme prison sentences, which are infused with racial bias and are counterproductive to public safety. Specifically, we commend:

  1. The elimination of most mandatory minimum sentences
  2. Lowering maximum sentences to 45 years
  3. Allowing judicial sentencing reconsideration after 20 years of imprisonment
  4. Reducing the scope and maximum penalty for felony murder

The Sentencing Project does not support any increases in criminal penalties, advocates for capping all sentences at 20 years of imprisonment and universal second look after 10 years, recommends a full repeal of the felony murder law, and urges the complete elimination of mandatory minimums. Nevertheless, we recognize that this bill as revised by the Judiciary Committee is a carefully balanced product of significant community feedback and negotiation. It is a significant step towards justice for the District. We urge the Council to pass the Revised Criminal Code Act of 2022 (RCCA), B24-0416.

Reducing Mandatory Minimums

Mandatory sentencing has been a key driver of mass incarceration by dramatically increasing the lengths of imposed sentences1 and has contributed to DC ranking eighth among states in its incarceration rate.2 A wide array of organizations have proposed eliminating mandatory minimums, including the American Bar Association, the American Law Institute, and the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund.3 As introduced, the RCCA would have eliminated all mandatory minimum sentences – creating a bold national model for mandatory minimum reform. As revised by the committee, the RCCA lowers but maintains the mandatory minimum sentence for first degree murder to 24 years, while still eliminating most mandatory minimums – still setting a valuable national precedent.

Limiting Maximum Sentences To 45 Years

Since 2004, The Sentencing Project has called for the end of life-without-parole sentences because they are cruel, costly, and counterproductive to public safety. We are joined by 200 organizations in recommending that maximum prison terms be limited to 20 years, except in unusual circumstances.4 Extreme sentences are counterproductive to advancing public safety. Criminological research has established that people age out of crime. For a range of offenses, crime rates peak around the late teenage years and begin a gradual decline in the early 20s.5 Criminal careers are typically under 10 years in duration.6 And long sentences are also a poor deterrent7 and extremely costly because of the higher cost of imprisoning the elderly.8 The RCCA’s proposal to limit prison terms to 45 years would still be considered a “de facto” life sentence by the United States Sentencing Commission.[9] While far from ideal, it is a critical step toward justice. We encourage the Council to lower the limit on maximum terms further in the future.

Sentencing Reconsideration After 20 Years

The RCCA’s expansion of Second Look to all adults after 20 years of imprisonment is backed by the wealth of evidence that individuals age out of crime, and the concept of second look is endorsed by leading legal experts.9 The Model Penal Code, for example, advises that everyone whose crime occurred at age 18 or older should be subject to judicial sentencing modification review after serving 15 years in prison.10 The American Bar Association’s policymaking body, the House of Delegates, urges lawmakers to authorize courts to take a second look at criminal sentences after 10 years of imprisonment.11 In Washington, DC, 39% of the imprisoned population has already served at least 10 years.12 While The Sentencing Project supports universal second look after 10 years, the RCCA’s expansion of second look is still an invaluable step in the right direction.

Reducing the Scope and Maximum Penalty for Felony Murder

Felony murder laws impose sentences associated with murder on people who neither intended to kill nor anticipated a death, and even on those who did not participate in a killing. These laws widen the net of extreme sentencing and are counterproductive to public safety. Felony murder laws also have particularly adverse impacts on people of color, young people, and women.13 The RCCA eliminates accomplice liability for felony murder, significantly narrowing its scope. By reclassifying felony murder from first- to second-degree murder, the RCCA also limits its potential punishment. While The Sentencing Project recommends the full repeal of the felony murder law, the RCCA’s reforms are still a vital limitation on felony murder liability’s harmful impact.

We urge the full Council to swiftly pass the RCCA. The RCCA is the impressive fruit of years of research, community feedback, criminal legal stakeholder input, and negotiation. Delaying its passage will only delay the fair administration of justice in the District.

Sincerely,

Amy Fettig
Executive Director
The Sentencing Project

1.

Travis, J., Western, B., & Redburn, S. (Eds.) (2014). The growth of incarceration in the United States: Exploring causes and consequences. National Research Council. National Academies Press. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18613/the-growth-of-incarceration-in-the-united-states-exploring-causes.

2.

Ghandnoosh, N. (2021). Testimony in support of DC Revised Criminal Code Act of 2021. The Sentencing Project. https://www.sentencingproject.org/publications/testimony-in-support-of-washington-dcs-revised-criminal-code-act-of-2021/.

3.

American Bar Association. (2017, August 15). ABA opposes mandatory minimum sentences. https://www.americanbar.org/news/abanews/aba-news-archives/2017/08/aba_opposes_mandator/; American Law Institute. (2021). Model Penal Code: Sentencing. Prepublication draft, p. 282; Justice Roundtable. (2020). Transformative justice: Recommendations for the new administration and the 117th Congress. https://www.sentencingproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Transformative-Justice.pdf.

4.

Justice Roundtable. (2020). Transformative justice: Recommendations for the new administration and the 117th Congress. https://www.sentencingproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Transformative-Justice.pdf.

5.

Peak arrest levels for young people have dramatically fallen in recent years. Loeber, R., & Farrington, D. (2014). Age-crime curve. Bruinsma & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Springer, pp. 12–18; Neil, R., & Sampson, R. (2021). The birth lottery of history: Arrest over the life course of multiple cohorts coming of age, 1995–2018. American Journal of Sociology, 126(5), 1127–1178. https://doi.org/10.1086/714062

6.

Piquero, A., Hawkins, J., & Kazemian, L. (2012). Criminal career patterns. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), From juvenile delinquency to adult crime: Criminal careers, justice policy, and prevention (pp. 14–46). New York, NY: Oxford University Press, p. 40.

7.

Nagin, D. (2019, March 21). Guest post: Reduce prison populations by reducing life sentences. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/crime-law/2019/03/21/guest-post-reduce-prison-populations-by-reducing-life-sentences/.

8.

Demyan, A. (2015). Elderly people in prison present little risk, but staggering costs. Vera Institute. https://www.vera.org/news/elderly-people-in-prison-present-little-risk-but-staggering-costs.

9.

Ghandnoosh, N. (2021). A second look at injustice. The Sentencing Project. https://www.sentencingproject.org/publications/a-second-look-at-injustice/.

10.

American Law Institute. (2021). Model Penal Code: Sentencing. Prepublication draft, p. 797.

11.

Robert, A. (2022, August 8). ABA provides 10 principles for ending mass incarceration and lengthy prison sentences. ABA Journal

12.

Ghandnoosh, N. & Nellis, A. (2022) How many people are spending over a decade in prison? The Sentencing Project. https://www.sentencingproject.org/publications/how-many-people-are-spending-over-a-decade-in-prison/

13.

Ghandnoosh, N. (2022). Felony Murder: An on-ramp for extreme sentencing. The Sentencing Project. https://www.sentencingproject.org/publications/felony-murder-an-on-ramp-for-extreme-sentencing/.

Travis, J., Western, B., & Redburn, S. (Eds.) (2014). The growth of incarceration in the United States: Exploring causes and consequences. National Research Council. National Academies Press. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18613/the-growth-of-incarceration-in-the-united-states-exploring-causes.
Ghandnoosh, N. (2021). Testimony in support of DC Revised Criminal Code Act of 2021. The Sentencing Project. https://www.sentencingproject.org/publications/testimony-in-support-of-washington-dcs-revised-criminal-code-act-of-2021/.
American Bar Association. (2017, August 15). ABA opposes mandatory minimum sentences. https://www.americanbar.org/news/abanews/aba-news-archives/2017/08/aba_opposes_mandator/; American Law Institute. (2021). Model Penal Code: Sentencing. Prepublication draft, p. 282; Justice Roundtable. (2020). Transformative justice: Recommendations for the new administration and the 117th Congress. https://www.sentencingproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Transformative-Justice.pdf.
Justice Roundtable. (2020). Transformative justice: Recommendations for the new administration and the 117th Congress. https://www.sentencingproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Transformative-Justice.pdf.
Peak arrest levels for young people have dramatically fallen in recent years. Loeber, R., & Farrington, D. (2014). Age-crime curve. Bruinsma & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Springer, pp. 12–18; Neil, R., & Sampson, R. (2021). The birth lottery of history: Arrest over the life course of multiple cohorts coming of age, 1995–2018. American Journal of Sociology, 126(5), 1127–1178. https://doi.org/10.1086/714062
Piquero, A., Hawkins, J., & Kazemian, L. (2012). Criminal career patterns. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), From juvenile delinquency to adult crime: Criminal careers, justice policy, and prevention (pp. 14–46). New York, NY: Oxford University Press, p. 40.
Nagin, D. (2019, March 21). Guest post: Reduce prison populations by reducing life sentences. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/crime-law/2019/03/21/guest-post-reduce-prison-populations-by-reducing-life-sentences/.
Demyan, A. (2015). Elderly people in prison present little risk, but staggering costs. Vera Institute. https://www.vera.org/news/elderly-people-in-prison-present-little-risk-but-staggering-costs.
Ghandnoosh, N. (2021). A second look at injustice. The Sentencing Project. https://www.sentencingproject.org/publications/a-second-look-at-injustice/.
American Law Institute. (2021). Model Penal Code: Sentencing. Prepublication draft, p. 797.
Robert, A. (2022, August 8). ABA provides 10 principles for ending mass incarceration and lengthy prison sentences. ABA Journal
Ghandnoosh, N. & Nellis, A. (2022) How many people are spending over a decade in prison? The Sentencing Project. https://www.sentencingproject.org/publications/how-many-people-are-spending-over-a-decade-in-prison/
Ghandnoosh, N. (2022). Felony Murder: An on-ramp for extreme sentencing. The Sentencing Project. https://www.sentencingproject.org/publications/felony-murder-an-on-ramp-for-extreme-sentencing/.

Related Resources

View all resources