Skip to main content

Letter in Support of Racial Impact Statements in Connecticut

February 21, 2013
The Sentencing Project encourages the Connecticut Legislature’s continued assessment of racial and ethnic impact statements in the consideration of proposed sentencing measures.

February 21, 2013

State Senator Eric D. Coleman
Co-Chair, Joint Committee on Judiciary
Legislative Office Building
Room 2500
Hartford, CT 06106-1591

State Representative Gerald Fox III
Co-Chair, Joint Committee on Judiciary
Legislative Office Building
Room 2502
Hartford, CT 06106-1591
State Senator Toni Nathaniel Harp
Co-Chair, Appropriations Committee
Legislative Office Building
Room 2700
Hartford, CT 06106-1591

State Representative Toni E. Walker
Co-Chair, Appropriations Committee
Legislative Office Building
Room 2702
Hartford, CT 06106-1591

RE: Racial Impact Statements for Proposed Sentencing Measures

Dear Chairpersons:

The Sentencing Project is an independent criminal justice policy organization engaged in research and advocacy.  We work for a fair and effective U.S. criminal justice system by promoting reforms in sentencing policy, addressing unjust racial disparities and practices, and advocating for alternatives to incarceration.  In 2008, the Connecticut Legislature took a step in the right direction when it authorized the request of racial and ethnic impact statements for bills passed successfully out of committee that may impact the state’s correctional population, but these have only been used infrequently since then.  We encourage committee members to request racial and ethnic impact statements during the 2013 Legislative Session.

Connecticut is among a handful of states that have authorized the development of racial impact statements for consideration by policymakers.  Racial impact statements are a tool that can provide a constructive means for policymakers to proactively assess how proposed sentencing laws may affect racial and ethnic disparities in the justice system.  Similar to fiscal or environmental impact statements, racial impact statements provide legislators with a statistical analysis of the projected impact of policy changes prior to legislative deliberation.  States with similar policies include Minnesota and Iowa.

We applaud the Connecticut Legislature’s effort to address disparities through racial and ethnic impact statements.  The Sentencing Project found that Connecticut’s black-to-white rate of incarceration was 114 percent higher than the national rate in 2005.1)Mauer, M. & King, R. S. (2007). Uneven Justice: State Rates of Incarceration by Race and Ethnicity.  Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project.  The Connecticut Department of Corrections (DOC) recently reported that African Americans made up 41.2% of Connecticut’s incarcerated population, compared to the African American proportion of 10% in the general population of Connecticut.

While some might argue that racial impact statements “inject race” into public policy, they merely bring to light data on the already existing racial dynamics of criminal justice policy. Research has documented that racial disparities at the sentencing stage are not necessarily a function of judicial bias but can often result from “race neutral” sentencing policies with skewed racial effects.2)Crow, M., & Johnson, K. (2008).  Race, ethnicity, and habitual offender sentencing.  Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19, 63-83.  For example, a significant contributor has been the set of policies adopted under the “war on drugs” framework.  Sentencing policies including mandatory minimums and school zone drug enhancements have shaped law enforcement and prosecutorial practices.

The sentencing policy that most dramatically reveals these dynamics is the policy that governed the two forms of cocaine, powder and crack.  Connecticut equalized penalties for crack and powder in 2005, but prior to reform the state had penalized crack and powder offenses in 1987 using a ratio of 56.7-to-1; a penalty of five years to life imprisonment had been triggered by trafficking either in one ounce (28.5 grams) of powder cocaine or .5 grams of crack cocaine.  The General Assembly eliminated the sentencing disparity between crack cocaine and powder cocaine by increasing the trigger quantity for crack cocaine to one-half ounce (approximately 14.25 grams) and lowering the quantity amount for powder cocaine to the same level.3)Porter. N.D. and Wright, V. (2011). Cracked Justice. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project.

The Sentencing Project encourages the Connecticut Legislature’s continued assessment of racial and ethnic impact statements in the consideration of proposed sentencing measures.   In doing so, we believe that the Judiciary and Appropriations committee should request that racial and ethnic impact statements be prepared as relevant bills are reported favorably from committee.


Marc Mauer
Executive Director

cc: Joint Judiciary Committee
Appropriations Committee



Related Posts
September 07, 2021

Meeting the Back-to-School Challenge: Get Involved!

By investing in proven solutions and partnering with the community, the education system can avert potential tragedy in 2021-22 and establish a new normal in our education system that fosters success, promotes equity, and recognizes the realities of adolescent behavior and brain development.
September 13, 2021

Letter Supporting Immediate Consideration and Passage of Sentencing Reform Legislation

The Sentencing Project's Executive Director Amy Fettig urged the U.S. Senate to take immediate steps to consider and pass sentencing reform legislation that builds upon the important progress enacted in 2018 with passage of the First Step Act. At least three bipartisan sentencing reform proposals, the First Step Implementation Act (S.1014), the COVID-19 Safer Detention Act (S.312), and the Prohibiting Punishment of Acquitted Conduct Act (S.601) await a floor vote after the Judiciary Committee approved them this past spring.