Skip to main content

Letter in Support of Connecticut HB-6581 and SB-1062

April 11, 2013
The proposed measures bring Connecticut into compliance with two recent U.S. Supreme Court cases, Graham v. Florida (130 S. Ct. 2011 [2010]) and Miller v. Alabama (567 US ___ [2012]) and clearly reflect a thoughtful attempt to represent the spirit of these two landmark rulings.

April 11, 2013

State Senator Eric Coleman
Co-Chair, Joint Committee on the Judiciary
Legislative Office Building
Room 2500
Hartford, CT 06106-1591
State Representative Gerald Fox
Co-Chair, Joint Committee on the Judiciary
Legislative Office Building
Room 2502
Hartford, CT 06106-1591


RE: The Sentencing Project Endorses HB-6581 and SB-1062

Dear Chairman Coleman and Chairman Fox,

The Sentencing Project is a national nonprofit research-based advocacy organization focused on various criminal justice issues.  These include the issue of juveniles serving lengthy prison sentences, including life without the possibility of parole.  We applaud the introduction of HB-6581 and SB-1062, which seek to bring Connecticut into compliance with two recent U.S. Supreme Court cases, Graham v. Florida ((130 S. Ct. 2011 [2010]) and Miller v. Alabama (567 US___[2012]).  These legislative proposals clearly reflect a thoughtful attempt to represent the spirit and the letter of these two landmark rulings.

Nationally, there are more than 2,600 people serving juvenile life without parole (JLWOP) sentences. In 2011, The Sentencing Project surveyed these individuals to learn more about their history, in an attempt to better understand how they came to commit an act of violence. We issued our findings in a report called,  The Lives of Juvenile Lifers: Findings from a National Survey.

What we learned is that the vast majority of these individuals, largely persons of color, were themselves the victims of violence and neglect long before they turned to crime.  On the whole, their home environments were marked with poverty, mistreatment, substance abuse, familial incarceration, community violence, and an overall lack of positive, adult guardianship.

  • Prior to their incarceration, one in three respondents were living in public housing. Family incarceration was common: 59% had a close relative in prison: for a quarter of them, this was a parent.
  • Physical abuse was also common: almost half experienced physical abuse in their homes and one in five respondents reported sexual abuse.
  • In their communities, exposure to violence was rampant. Seventy-one percent saw drugs being openly sold in their neighborhoods regularly, and more than half saw violence in their neighborhoods at least once a week. Almost three quarters of those who responded to our survey said that they themselves had been the victim of violence in the community.

Despite these early signs of trouble which are so common among this population, these factors are rarely included in the sentencing decision.  In Graham v. Florida, the Court ruled that individuals who are convicted of non-homicide offenses for crimes committed before their 18th birthday must be allowed a “meaningful opportunity of parole.”  In HB-6581, legislators have wisely expanded the category of individuals to include those serving 10 years or more who, in accordance with Connecticut law, are otherwise required to serve at least 85% of their sentence.

Regardless of the influences of childhood factors, the sentence of life without parole for homicide offenses is non-discretionary in Connecticut; a meaningful opportunity for parole is decidedly excluded from this mandatory sentencing structure.  The Miller v. Alabama decision ruled this unconstitutional. The Court held that a judge or jury can no longer bypass important and relevant factors about youth in sentencing decisions. The Court noted several specific factors that must be considered in cases involving LWOP for individuals under 18.

SB-1062 requires that the mitigating factors enumerated in the Miller opinion be considered at the time of sentencing.  These factors acknowledge the reality that was borne out in our research repeatedly: youth who commit acts of violence are very frequently enduring violent and neglectful treatment in their own lives.  This, compounded with the fact that adolescents lack the maturity to appreciate the consequences of their actions and are unduly susceptible to peer pressure, requires a different, age-appropriate sentencing scheme that allows for these factors to mitigate the length of sentence.

Adolescent brain science confirms that young people have a reduced capacity to understand the consequences of their actions, a reduced capacity to restrain impulsivity, an undeveloped sense of remorse, and are also impulsive.  Science also tells us that teenagers are uniquely susceptible to peer pressure—particularly negative peer pressure—because their sense of independence and autonomy is still being formed and continues to evolve until their mid-twenties. Of course, one need not be an adolescent brain expert to understand that teenagers often act in ways that are difficult to understand.  The Supreme Court has repeatedly required states to take this knowledge into account in its sentencing structures for youth through this series of opinions.

The value of taking a second look at young prisoners after an initial period of incarceration was confirmed in our survey research as well.  We gathered information from respondents about their efforts at rehabilitation, education, and family connections.  We also asked them about disciplinary actions taken against them in prison. What we learned is that prisoners are actively engaged in self-improvement, stay in regular contact with their families, and are less likely to violate prison rules as they mature into adulthood. Specifically, we found the following:

  • Two-thirds of juvenile lifers have completed high school or obtained a GED since coming to prison and an additional 24% have plans for completion.
  • Half of the survey respondents talk on the phone with their family weekly, and 92% exchange mail with loved ones at least every few months.
  • Among those who have been in prison for 10 years or more, 35% have not had an infraction for more than three years.

We urge the Connecticut legislature to act swiftly to pass these important legislative proposals that will bring Connecticut into compliance with Graham v. Florida and Miller v. Alabama.


Marc Mauer
Executive Director

Related Posts
May 27, 2021

Letter in Support of the COVID-19 Safer Detention Act and First Step Implementation Act

In a letter of support submitted to the Senate Judiciary Committee, The Sentencing Project's Executive Director Amy Fettig expressed the importance of advancing the COVID-19 Safer Detention Act (S.312) and the First Step Implementation Act (S.1014).
February 17, 2021

No End In Sight: America's Enduring Reliance on Life Imprisonment

Ashley Nellis
In the United States, more than 200,000 people are serving life sentences – one out of every seven in prison.